Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |
| 2 | JONES LONGENBACH Melanie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | ||
| 3 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 3 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 100% | 100% | 75% | 30% | 4% | ||
| 5 | MING YUE | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | 2% | |
| 6 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 7 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 8 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 100% | 74% | 29% | 4% | ||
| 9 | NARANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 10 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 11 | SHEN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 3% | |
| 12 | SHEN Annabel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 13 | YE Catherine | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 15 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | ||
| 16 | KANIUK Rachel | 100% | 93% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | DU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 18 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 19 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 17% | |
| 20 | ZIMBALIST Lila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% |
| 21 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | |
| 22 | RASO Sofia G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 23 | PAGES Melanie | 100% | 99% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | ZHANG Rongrui | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 27 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 28 | CLEVENGER Magdalena | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 29 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | |
| 30 | KURCHIN Ekaterina Y. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 32 | ZHEN Ellen | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 98% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | KARKHANIS Maya | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | ||
| 39 | SILVER Anna | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 41 | HUSAIN Amber | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | MORO Diana | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.