Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MIDYANY Evan | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | HUANG Kenneth | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | KIM Henry | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | LEE DoWon | D V V V V D | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
5 | LIU Adam | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | AHMED Mohsen | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | KIM Gene | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
8 | YI Nathan | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
9 | CAO Gavin | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
10 | MEHROTRA Neel | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
11 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
12 | TESFAYE Elias | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
13 | BOUDREAUX James | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
14 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
15 | LUO Alexander | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
16 | NG Nico | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
17 | TARCHICHI Robby | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
18 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
19 | DODIN Daniel M. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
20 | DURKIN Hudson | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
21 | LEE Anton | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
21 | LI Jade | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
23 | DANG William | V V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
24 | SHCHUR Grayson | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
25 | HE Bronto | V V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
26 | KABA Elias | V V D D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
27 | ZHANG Jonathan | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
27 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
29 | MIDYANY Ryan | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
30 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
31 | CHEN Tianjun | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
32 | HELMY Richard | D D V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
33 | DANILOV Artur | V V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
34 | LEE Harrison | D V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
34 | TOWNSHEND Connor | V V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
36 | TSIEN Richard | V D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
37 | ZHANG Marcus | D D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
38 | GU Eric | D V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
39 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | D V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
40 | ZHU Yiming | D D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
41 | NOOL Aaron | V V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
42 | LIN ZIJIE | V V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
43 | NOOL Alexander | V V D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
44 | FONG Kobe | D D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
45 | WHITE Jackson | V D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
46 | MASKIN Mikhail | V D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
47 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V D V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
48 | SOLOMON Aryeh | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
49 | LEE Leo | D V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
50 | MA Owen | D D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
51 | FRIZZELL Kai | D D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
52 | FOGEL Jake | D V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
53 | MA Joseph | V D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
54 | BOBORIS Dimitrios | D D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
55 | WU Jiachen | D D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
56 | QU RuiTing | D D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
57 | CUELLAR Markus | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
58 | WANG Eason | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
59 | HANNA Alexander | D D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
60 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
61 | STRAFFORD Andrew | D D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
62 | FENG Xinmin | D D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
63 | GAO Ryan | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
64 | KIM Louie | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
65 | HUANG Max | D V D V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
66 | SHAPIRO Samuel | D V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
67 | SONG Aidan | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
68 | ZHAI Junqi | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
69 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | D V D V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
70 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
71 | MAZEL Antonin | D V D D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
72 | CHIANG William | V D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
73 | PUTHOFF Henry | V D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
74 | VANDERMEER Joshua | V V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
75 | ZHANG Shuhao | D D V D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
76 | SHAO Mason | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
77 | ARMSTRONG Payson | V D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
77 | MEDISETTI Arjun | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
79 | ZINCHUK Yuri | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
80 | SI Anderson | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
81 | WANG Marcus | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
82 | PENG Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
83 | ZHENG Jasper | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
84 | CHEN Daniel | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
84 | ZHENG Jason | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
86 | WU Matthew | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
87 | ZHAO Brandon | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
88 | LEE Ryan | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
89 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | D D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
90 | CHAN Ian | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
91 | WELCH Sebastian | V D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
92 | CHEN Jayden A | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
93 | DAI Jason | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
94 | ROBERTS Arthur | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
95 | YOON Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
96 | MUELLER Travis | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
97 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
97 | DALY Liam | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.