Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 2 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 3 | SHENG Dalton | - | - | - | - | 6% | 42% | 52% |
| 3 | HAN Alexander | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 5 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 6 | XU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
| 7 | WU Macus | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 52% | 26% |
| 8 | MARTIRE Luca | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | O'LEARY Colin | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 47% | 5% |
| 10 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 11 | HART-SYED declan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 12 | BAKSHI Aman | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 13 | SICAT Justin | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 14 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 15 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 16 | BAI Austin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 48% | 15% |
| 17 | SIU Max | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 18 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 19 | CHANG Parker | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 35% | 4% |
| 20 | YANG David H. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | CZARNECKI Thomas | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 22 | JIN Andy | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 23 | KOVACS Harrison | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | KAYE Ben | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 25 | BEYDOUN Sam | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 25 | YOUM Tyson | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | TANG Michael | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SALEH Ali | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
| 29 | BLACK Henry | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 30 | GRUNENWALD Henri | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | |
| 31 | CAO Joshua | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 32 | ZHANG Ethan | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Hanru | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 30% |
| 34 | REN Ryan | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 36 | LEONG Samuel | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 37 | HU Daniel | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HU Michael | 1% | 11% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 40 | SHAW eric | - | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 41 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHEN kenneth | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 43 | QIAN Zekai | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 44 | WANG Luke | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 46 | XIA Vincent | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | LI Andrew | 8% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | OH Joshua | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | KUO Phineas | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 50 | MA Matthew | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | MANCHALA Vedu | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 53 | ROPER Griffin | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 55 | ZHENG Austin | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | WANG Joshua | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | ZHANG Julian | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 58 | DAWSON Myer | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LIU Ryan | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 61 | ZHANG Ethan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Vincent J | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 63 | ROTH Adam | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHONG Kingsley | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | SUN Andrew | 46% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | LEE Aeden | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | LIU Jeremy | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | SPERBER Miles | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | KAO Chris | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | MOON Nicolas | 28% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 74 | CAI Max | 32% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 75 | MONDESIR Chace | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | ROTH Gavin | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | HUANG Marcus | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 78 | KOO Jaeha | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | JUVVADI Pratham | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | MU jason | 16% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | PRICE Ezra | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.