Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 2 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 3 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 52% |
| 3 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 5 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 6 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
| 7 | WU Macus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 26% |
| 8 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | O'LEARY Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 5% |
| 10 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 11 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 13 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 14 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 15 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 56% |
| 16 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
| 17 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 18 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 19 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 4% |
| 20 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 22 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 23 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 25 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 27 | TANG Michael | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SALEH Ali | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 29 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 30 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
| 31 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 32 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
| 34 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 36 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | - |
| 37 | HU Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HU Michael | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 40 | SHAW eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
| 41 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 2% |
| 43 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 44 | WANG Luke | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 45 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 46 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | LI Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | OH Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 50 | MA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 51 | MANCHALA Vedu | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 53 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 55 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 56 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 58 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Vincent J | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 63 | ROTH Adam | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 66 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | LIU Jeremy | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | SPERBER Miles | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | KAO Chris | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 72% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 74 | CAI Max | 100% | 68% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 75 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | ROTH Gavin | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 78 | KOO Jaeha | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | JUVVADI Pratham | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | MU jason | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | PRICE Ezra | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.