Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
2 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
3 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 52% |
3 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
5 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
6 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
7 | WU Macus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 26% |
8 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 14% | 1% |
9 | O'LEARY Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 5% |
10 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
11 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
12 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
13 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
14 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
15 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 56% |
16 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
17 | SIU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
18 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
19 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 4% |
20 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
21 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
22 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
23 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | 1% |
24 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
25 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
25 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | TANG Michael | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
28 | SALEH Ali | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
29 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
30 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
31 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
32 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% | - |
33 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
34 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% | |
35 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
36 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | - |
37 | HU Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
38 | HU Michael | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
39 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
40 | SHAW eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
41 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 2% |
43 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
44 | WANG Luke | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
45 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
46 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
47 | LI Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
48 | OH Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
49 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
50 | MA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
51 | MANCHALA Vedu | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
52 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
53 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
54 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - |
55 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
56 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
57 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | - |
58 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
60 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
61 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
62 | ZHANG Vincent J | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
63 | ROTH Adam | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
64 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
66 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 54% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
67 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
68 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
69 | LIU Jeremy | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
70 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
71 | SPERBER Miles | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
72 | KAO Chris | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
73 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 72% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
74 | CAI Max | 100% | 68% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
75 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
75 | ROTH Gavin | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
75 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
78 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
78 | KOO Jaeha | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
80 | JUVVADI Pratham | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | MU jason | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
82 | PRICE Ezra | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.