University of Arizona - North Rec - Tucson, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BALDWIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 2 | KARAMAGA Ganza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 12% | |
| 3 | LUNA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | FOISSET Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 5 | PERON Nicholas (Nick) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 5 | MANDEL Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 7 | FISHER David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 8 | PITTMAN Stephen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | SMITH Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 10 | BINDER Ayven | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | SCHWENK Cody D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 12 | DIMITROVA Tzvetelina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | KUNKEL Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 14 | ORELUP Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 15 | IRVING David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 16 | WOLCOTT Charlie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
| 17 | PYE Emily | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 18 | FESTIN Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 19 | WOOLCOCK Cash | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 20 | HERRON Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 21 | TROMBLEY Matthew | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 21 | CHEN Lilianna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 6% | - |
| 23 | LUCKEY Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | PABLO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 7% | |
| 25 | DAVIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | SANDIRI Shanmukh Rishith | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | BEATY Trace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 29 | WELLING Cohen | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | HOWIE Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | BRANDT Jacob | 100% | 99% | 70% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CUEVAS Tom | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
| 33 | SANBORN Dimitri | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | PEDERSEN Haakon | 100% | 90% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | FELDMAN Louis | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | CHEN Yuan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SHARP Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | PERON Logan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | CONWAY Collin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
| 40 | JOHN Jennifer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 41 | BELTRAN Carissa | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | BARVICK Kathleen | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | EASTWOOD Darin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | MARIKOS Christina | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | DUNCAN Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | PAOLI Geovanna | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | KELLEHER Cash | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 48 | WELLING Michael | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | HEWITT Christa | 100% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | FAIR Elizabeth | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | CHEN Ngai Man | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MAZZOLA Michael | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | ROLDAN Ethan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | NASR Arshia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | WHITAKER Lauren | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | WELLS Mikaela | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.