Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
2 | CHEN Leonardo | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | TSE Maxwell | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
3 | KUGLER Luke | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
5 | CHEN Allen | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | XIE Brandon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
7 | AKYAMAC Bora | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | WONG King-Yee | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
9 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
10 | TRULL A.J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
11 | WONG Maximus | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | AHMED Mohsen | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | DURKIN Brian | V D V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
14 | RIM Eugene | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
15 | SIYANKO Joshua | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
16 | WHITE Aidan | D V D D V | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
17 | SONG Changze | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
18 | SPRINGER Elijah | V V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
19 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | LIU Jeremiah W. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | RVACHEV Michael | V V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | LIU Adam | D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
23 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | V D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
24 | YU Samuel | V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
25 | CHEN Edward | D V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
26 | SINGLETON Aman | D V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
26 | LYCHKO Maksym | V D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | SUN Lucas | V D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
29 | ZHAO Pierce | D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
30 | TESFAYE Elias | V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
31 | LI Jade | V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
32 | NILSEN Mark | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | PETERSEN Zachary | D V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
34 | SHAPIRO Natan | V V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
35 | PESSIN Nadav | V D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
36 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
37 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | V V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
38 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | V D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
39 | YIN Chujun | D V D D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
40 | BRASSARD Calvin | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
41 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | V D V V D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
42 | STEIN Philip | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
43 | STAUDINGER Enzo | V D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
44 | HU Robert J. | D V V V D D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 | |
45 | SIALA Omar | D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
46 | LEE Henry | D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
47 | HELMY Richard | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
48 | MORI Seneca | D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
49 | MILLER Quinlan | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
50 | MARIN Ayan N. | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
51 | LI Ray | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
52 | ROSIELLO Francesco | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
53 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | D V D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
54 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | V D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
55 | ACAR Devin | D D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
56 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
57 | WU Chi Kuan | D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
58 | PAN Anthony | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
59 | SUH Aiden | V D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
60 | KIM Nathan | D D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
60 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | D D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
62 | KAPLAN Maddox | D D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
63 | REGINA Julian | D D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
64 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
65 | KIM Samuel | D V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
66 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | V D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
67 | PTASZEK Al | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
68 | HSIEN Hong-yu | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
69 | LAW Oliver | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
69 | LIANG Haojia | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
71 | CARMAN Elliot | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
72 | ZHANG Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
73 | SONG Ryan | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.