Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 2 | CHEN Leonardo | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 3 | TSE Maxwell | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 3 | KUGLER Luke | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
| 5 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
| 6 | XIE Brandon | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 7 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% | |
| 8 | WONG King-Yee | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 9 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 10 | TRULL A.J. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 11 | WONG Maximus | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 41% | 9% |
| 12 | AHMED Mohsen | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 13 | DURKIN Brian | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 14 | RIM Eugene | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 16 | WHITE Aidan | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 17 | SONG Changze | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
| 18 | SPRINGER Elijah | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 20 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% |
| 21 | RVACHEV Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | LIU Adam | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% | |
| 23 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | YU Samuel | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 25 | CHEN Edward | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
| 26 | LYCHKO Maksym | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | SUN Lucas | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | ZHAO Pierce | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | TESFAYE Elias | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 31 | LI Jade | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 32 | NILSEN Mark | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | PETERSEN Zachary | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 34 | SHAPIRO Natan | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PESSIN Nadav | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 36 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 37 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 38 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 39 | YIN Chujun | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | BRASSARD Calvin | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 42 | STEIN Philip | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | HU Robert J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 45 | SIALA Omar | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 46 | LEE Henry | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | HELMY Richard | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | MORI Seneca | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | MILLER Quinlan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 50 | MARIN Ayan N. | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | LI Ray | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 54 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | ACAR Devin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 56 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | WU Chi Kuan | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | PAN Anthony | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 59 | SUH Aiden | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | KIM Nathan | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 60 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 62 | KAPLAN Maddox | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | REGINA Julian | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | KIM Samuel | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 67 | PTASZEK Al | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | HSIEN Hong-yu | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | LAW Oliver | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | LIANG Haojia | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | CARMAN Elliot | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Jonathan | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | SONG Ryan | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.