October NAC

Div II Women's Foil

Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 2:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GAYDOS Sofia C. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 4%
2 LEVI Lea 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 32% 6%
3 REN Olivia Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 29%
3 KONG Olivia 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 15% 2%
5 YE Eileen 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9%
6 JO Mia C. 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 21% 3%
7 CEPERO Rosabel 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 21% 3%
8 BRADFORD Meeah 100% 100% 100% 97% 74% 28%
9 MASSICK Laine 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
10 OH Erin H. 100% 100% 97% 78% 39% 9% -
11 LI Phoebe J. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 4%
12 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa 100% 99% 91% 65% 30% 7% 1%
13 KOENIG Charlotte R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 31%
14 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 46% 13%
15 HALL Velma 100% 100% 98% 81% 42% 9%
16 YHIP Mikaela M. 100% 99% 89% 59% 24% 5% -
17 HO Brianna W. 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 20%
18 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 17%
19 GOMES Rafaella T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 27%
20 ALTEN Ayaka 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 21% 3%
21 BANIN Alexandra G. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
22 CAO Arianna L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 34%
23 UPTON Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 22%
24 TRAN Ava D. 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
25 VEERKAMP Molly 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
25 DE LA CRUZ Alyssa 100% 100% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1%
27 CHEN Shiuan-An Shannon 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 30%
28 ATLURI Srija 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 10% 1%
29 LUO ZIWEN 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 9%
30 CASTANEDA Erika L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 29%
31 KLINE Melissa C. 100% 49% 10% 1% - -
32 MARLEY-WEAVER Jordan 100% 86% 51% 19% 4% - -
33 KONG Chin-Yi 100% 99% 87% 57% 22% 4% < 1%
34 KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 44% 10%
35 SARTORI Taylor M. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 20%
36 LAU Chloe M. 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 5%
37 LEE Paulina 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 22%
38 WU Irene M. 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
39 DE LA CRUZ Ava 100% 99% 91% 63% 25% 4%
40 LOCKE Savannah 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 13%
41 PERLMAN Talia 100% 94% 64% 25% 4% -
42 FERNANDES Thea 100% 100% 94% 70% 31% 7% -
43 SHANG Andrea 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 4% -
43 RASO Sofia G. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 46% 10%
45 ZHENG Ivy 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
46 BOODELL Ella 100% 100% 96% 77% 39% 9% 1%
46 HIRSCH Sophie A. 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 16% 2%
48 KIM Kayla A. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 23% 3%
49 MOLHO Sofia 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 38%
50 PROCOPIO Lucia 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 16% 2%
51 LEE Angelina S. 100% 98% 76% 37% 10% 1% -
52 LI Shuang 100% 91% 57% 21% 4% -
53 XU Christine 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 19%
54 CHO Gracie L. 100% 100% 98% 87% 53% 15%
55 PARKER Emilie Rose (Rosie) 100% 96% 73% 36% 9% 1%
56 SUN Danica Z. 100% 100% 98% 83% 48% 15% 2%
57 RATSEP Ariel 100% 99% 90% 62% 23% 4% -
58 WONG Julia M. 100% 100% 98% 81% 39% 8% -
59 CHAMBERLAIN Lola J. 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
60 HOLLE Aviella S. 100% 99% 94% 73% 39% 10%
61 CHUNG Ashley J. 100% 93% 64% 27% 6% -
62 HAGOPIAN Natalie 100% 100% 94% 72% 38% 11% 1%
63 ADAMS KIM Natalie 100% 95% 70% 31% 7% 1% -
64 CHON Sydney 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 28% 6%
65 SADAN Jordan E. 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 13% 2%
66 PAPADAKIS Lily 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 20%
67 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% -
68 SAXENA SEJAL 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 32% 7%
69 YEH Marissa E. 100% 98% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
70 WEINTRAUB Io H. 100% 99% 84% 50% 18% 3% -
71 LEE Jessica Doyun 100% 67% 19% 2% - -
72 WU Julianna Y. 100% 99% 89% 59% 23% 4%
73 VOHRA Anusha 100% 99% 85% 52% 19% 3% -
74 SU Alysa J. 100% 98% 80% 43% 12% 1% -
75 THOMAS Aaria S. 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 7% 1%
76 YIN Helen 100% 95% 66% 25% 5% - -
77 PO Edith 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
78 SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 8% 1%
79 SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. 100% 98% 85% 53% 20% 4% -
80 POWERS Kathryn 100% 71% 26% 4% - - -
81 SHEPTAK Gabrielle 100% 86% 47% 14% 2% - -
82 COKER Bettina M. 100% 100% 96% 73% 32% 6% -
83 MING YUE 100% 96% 79% 46% 16% 3% -
84 BECCHINA Claire E. 100% 74% 27% 5% 1% - -
85 VONA Elena M. 100% 98% 87% 57% 21% 3%
86 RAMAN Tanvi 100% 98% 80% 37% 8% 1%
87 AMISTOSO Jeanne 100% 91% 63% 28% 7% 1%
88 HOBSON Leena 100% 86% 31% 5% - -
89 NARANG Maya 100% 92% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
90 GEE Bea L. 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% - -
91 WANG ROBIN 100% 56% 15% 2% - - -
92 BERG Stephanie A. 100% 99% 88% 58% 24% 5% -
93 MULLENEX Laura 100% 53% 9% 1% - - -
94 WESTFALL Cindy M. 100% 89% 53% 16% 2% - -
94 KELBLEY Elena J. 100% 75% 33% 8% 1% - -
96 CHUNG Rachel J. 100% 99% 82% 46% 14% 2% -
97 SIMPSON Lydia Q. 100% 86% 45% 10% 1% -
98 SCHATZ Kristina J. 100% 94% 71% 36% 10% 1%
99 STONE Colleen R. 100% 91% 58% 22% 4% - -
99 HIRSCH Gabriella H. 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
101 DRAGNE Alexis D. 100% 83% 45% 13% 2% - -
102 HEISER Anna M. 100% 82% 38% 8% 1% - -
102 SULLIVAN Aya M. 100% 32% 5% - - - -
104 BOLES Sophia 100% 64% 20% 3% - - -
105 HICKS Bronwen 100% 55% 16% 3% - - -
106 SCHWARTZMAN Salma 100% 30% 4% - - - -
106 OLEDZKA Julia 100% 94% 60% 16% 2% - -
108 LAMBERT Lisa L. 100% 87% 47% 12% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.