Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RIPLEY Ian | V V V V | V V V V | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 5 | COHEN Henry | V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 6 | PAMERLEAU Ian | D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 7 | HAUCK Samuel J. | D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 8 | FRANGER Jeff | D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 9 | VAN DYK Mark | V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 10 | STAUBITZ Marc | V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 11 | KRAVCENKO Nikita | D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 12 | MACNEIL Sydney | V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 13 | RICKERT Michael A. | D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 14 | MYERS Lewis | D V D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 15 | MACNEIL Matthew | V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 16 | WANG Ellie | V D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 17 | DUTTON Kimberly | V D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 18 | PLUMMER Ken | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 19 | YANG Junhu | D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 20 | ANGELIDES Gabrielle | D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.