Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% |
2 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
3 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
3 | CHALUT Etienne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
5 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
6 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
7 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
8 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
9 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
10 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
11 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
12 | WU Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
13 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 4% |
14 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
15 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
16 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
17 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
18 | WEI Winston | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - |
19 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
20 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
21 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
22 | BI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
23 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
24 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
25 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
26 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% |
27 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
28 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
29 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
30 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
31 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
32 | FLYNT Hayden | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
35 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
36 | YANG Charles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
37 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
38 | WU Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
39 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
41 | DUNLAP Ezra | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
42 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
43 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
44 | CHONG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
45 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
46 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
47 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
48 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
49 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
49 | ZHANG Raphael | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
52 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
54 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | UPENDER West | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
56 | HE Bourne | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
57 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
58 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
59 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
60 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
60 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
63 | LUI Justin | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
64 | CHENG Mason | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
65 | SEIGEL Duncan | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | KULKARNI Karan | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
67 | MARTIN Lucas | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
68 | GUO Joey | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
69 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
70 | PARK David | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
71 | LAM Kirin | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
72 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
73 | PARK William | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
74 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
75 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
76 | YUAN Jonathan | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.