William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HENDERSON James C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% |
| 2 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
| 3 | LIN Felix | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 16% |
| 3 | JACKSON Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 5 | PARCELL Colby | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 6 | XU Ivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% | 2% |
| 7 | FENKER William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 24% | |
| 8 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | |
| 9 | BENE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 10 | SEMP Brannon A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 20% | |
| 11 | GOLART Dylan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 12 | BENE Paul | 100% | 70% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 13 | LAUDO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | MAUREL Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 15 | GOSNELL James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | 1% |
| 16 | SU Ji | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | LE TAN | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 18 | REEDER Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 19 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 32% | 4% | - |
| 20 | BAIN Tiernan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 21 | FANG Elena | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 22 | FOREST Sung | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 23 | FANG Darcy | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | RACHAPROLU DIVYAGNYAAN Siddartha | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | FLEEGER Sophia | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 26 | LESTYAN Cat | 100% | 79% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 26 | WANG Ziyao | 100% | 99% | 88% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | CHON-BAKER Hayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 29 | URIBE David | 100% | 99% | 82% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | LAWLESS Elizabeth | 100% | 89% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | RUDMIN Peter | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | FIGLOZZI Cordelia | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | WALLACE Leo | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | BORGESON Abigail | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 35 | SILK Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 36 | HUANG Anni | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHOU Deborah | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | HILLEARY Mike | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | KEESEE Devon | 100% | 50% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.