Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 2 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | KO Brian J. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 3 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 5 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 6 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | LI Raphael C. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Jett | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 9 | FERNANDES Zain | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 10 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 11 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 12 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 13 | LAO Scott E. | - | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
| 14 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
| 15 | WILKENS Zach Q. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 17 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 18 | WONG Anthony M. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 19 | OH Samuel H. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 20 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 21 | MAO Connor | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 22 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | XIAO EDWARD | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 26 | WHARTON Zachary | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 28 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | MORALES Ian N. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | NGUYEN Nish | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | OH Jonathan | - | 6% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 32 | KONG Kenneth | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% |
| 33 | LAM Landon | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Derek A. | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | LUNA Emilio | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 36 | OCKENFUSS Jeremiah J. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 37 | WU Conrad J. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 39 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% |
| 40 | SELIVANOV Adam | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LI Ryan Z. | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 29% | 48% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHENG Matthew S. | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | LIN Dashiell | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 45 | HUANG Kevin D. | 22% | 53% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Wilson | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | WOMACH Tristan | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | CHOI Samuel | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | PIESNER Joshua C. | - | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | NAM Michael | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KIM Banseok | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LUH Ethan K. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | STIAGUN Nikita | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LEE David Y. | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | MO Jason | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 58 | GUIDACE Enzo D. | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | BOHMAN Joseph | 21% | 46% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.