Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 2 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 3 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 3 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 5 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 6 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Jett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 9 | FERNANDES Zain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 10 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 11 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 12 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 13 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 15 | WILKENS Zach Q. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 17 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 18 | WONG Anthony M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 19 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% | |
| 20 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | |
| 21 | MAO Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 22 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 26 | WHARTON Zachary | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | |
| 28 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 31 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
| 32 | KONG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 33 | LAM Landon | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | LUNA Emilio | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 36 | OCKENFUSS Jeremiah J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 37 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 39 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 40 | SELIVANOV Adam | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 60% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 100% | 71% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 45 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 78% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Wilson | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | NAM Michael | 100% | 59% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KIM Banseok | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | MO Jason | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 5% | 1% | |
| 58 | GUIDACE Enzo D. | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | BOHMAN Joseph | 100% | 79% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.