Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LAI Mars | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
2 | JI Derek | - | - | 5% | 28% | 51% | 15% | |
3 | QI Zach | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
3 | DESAI Arthav | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
5 | FU BRANDEN | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
6 | YE Aaron | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
7 | DUFF Michael | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
8 | TABANCAY Cole | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
9 | CHUNG Evan | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
10 | PARK Jayden | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
11 | WANG Henrik | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 29% | |
12 | YUAN Alan | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
13 | CHEN Donovan | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
14 | WANG James | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
15 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | LEE Junhu | - | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
17 | YANG Aegon | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - |
18 | FAN Yuen | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
19 | CAO Osmond | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
20 | LOVELL Jackson | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
21 | ZHENG Matt | 2% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | - | |
22 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Atticus A | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
23 | LIN Rongcheng Noah | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
24 | WU August | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
25 | LEE Nathan | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | QIAO Jason | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
27 | YUNG Nathan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
28 | LEE Caleb | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
29 | GALANG Aiden | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
30 | JIAO Lawrence | 3% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | MEDIRATTA Remy | < 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
32 | SETH Suraj | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
33 | LI Linus | 1% | 10% | 39% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | GUO Aiden | 2% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | |
35 | LEI Isaac | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | KIM Connor | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | CHEN Brian | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
38 | WU Aiden | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | LEE Aidan | 31% | 48% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | YANG Kaleb | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
41 | CHENG Daniel | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
42 | SEVERT David | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
43 | WU Vincent | 25% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.