Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | FORTNER Lance R. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
2 | WANG Nathan | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
3 | MOHEBI Saam | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
3 | LEE Matthew C. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
5 | KIM Benjamin I. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
6 | THOMPSON Chester | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
7 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
8 | MAENG Jake W. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
9 | SHAMIS Mark | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
10 | GREEN Ummi | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
11 | LIANG Aaron | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
12 | USHER Alexander | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
13 | OGILVIE Evan C. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
14 | LI Henry | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
15 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
16 | ZHU Max | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
17 | WONG Nathan | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
18 | GILLISON Edward L. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
19 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
20 | GREEN Jabreel | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
21 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
22 | CHUNG Thomas | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
23 | KIM Sterling S. | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
24 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
25 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
26 | FOREMAN Alexander E. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
26 | KOPPE Alexander | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | KOPPE Benjamin | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
29 | KIM Darius H. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | WOMACH Tristan | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.