Manhattan Fencing Center - New York, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PEDERSEN Charles | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
2 | KO Caleb | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
3 | KUO Phineas | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
3 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
5 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
6 | YANG David H. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
7 | FOGELSON Hugh | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
8 | FEDER ACADIA | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
9 | KO Darby | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
10 | LI Madison | - | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
11 | ZUCKER Collin | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | ZHANG Julian | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
13 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
14 | GRASSIE James | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
15 | COLE Sofia | 3% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
16 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | RICHELSON Alice | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
18 | ZHENG Austin | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
19 | LIN Justin | 2% | 20% | 47% | 27% | 4% | - | |
20 | BAULIN Zoya | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
21 | KASPER Lucia | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% | - |
22 | KELLER JohnChristopher | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
23 | WILLIAMS Aaron | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
23 | WILLIAMS John | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
25 | GAO Henry | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
26 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | STEWART Isla | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.