Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 25% | |
2 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
3 | MOHOV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
3 | MILLER Hayden | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
5 | NIXON Scott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
6 | COHEN Henry | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | < 1% | |
7 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 66% | 19% |
8 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
9 | NOWAK Joseph A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
10 | BOYER Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
11 | ERICKSON Jonas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | |
12 | MILLER Brent | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
13 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 97% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
14 | KRAVCENKO Nikita | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | 2% | |
15 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
16 | MYERS Lewis | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
17 | PLUMMER Ken | 100% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
18 | MILLER Owen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% | |
20 | METZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
21 | LIETTE Charles | 100% | 98% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | |
22 | CLARKE Calix | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
23 | WANG Ellie | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
24 | KANUK Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | - |
25 | MACNEIL Sydney | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | DUTTON Kimberly | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.