Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Lina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 2 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 3 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 3 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
| 5 | DONG Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 20% | |
| 6 | LEE Jeemin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
| 7 | PINEDA jade luna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 33% | |
| 8 | PARK Zena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | |
| 9 | OWENS Elise | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 38% | |
| 10 | MOORE Addisyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 8% |
| 11 | IQBAL Mariam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 12 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 13 | CHOI Jordan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
| 15 | MEITZEN Havah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
| 17 | KATS Ekaterina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 18 | ROTHMAN Rebecca | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | KIM Sophia | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 20 | LIU Joanna | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | BALIN Julia | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | BLANKS Campbell | 100% | 95% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | FERRONE Gianna | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | SIMANJUNTAK Jocelyn | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | - | - | |
| 25 | HAILU Raena | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 26 | VENZON Makena Jane | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | PHAN Logan | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | TAN Isabella | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Katelyn | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | IBRAHIM Yara | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 32 | CHENG Emma | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MILLER Vai | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | LUEKEN Adelina | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | CARDINAL Elise | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | WANG hannah | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | BRUCE Sevi | 100% | 100% | 84% | 38% | 6% | - | - |
| 38 | JOSEPH Rachel | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | BRUCE Lana | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHEN Mikayla | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.