Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 2 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 3 | DUCKETT Myles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 5 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 6 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 7 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 8 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 5% |
| 9 | ANAND Rohan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | OSENAR Sam | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 14 | PI Alexander | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 15 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 16 | PATEL Rayn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 17 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 18 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 20 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% |
| 22 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
| 23 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | TRAN Dash | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 25 | GERSTMANN Max T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
| 26 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 27 | KERCHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 28 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 29 | SUBRAMANIAM Oliver C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 30 | SKIMEL Michael | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 89% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 34 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 35 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | GONG zihao | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | KURILO Michael | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 45 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | YAN William | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 48 | GONG ziqian | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | SAMMI Mukul | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | JIANG Jeremy | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | WOLITZER Gage | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | ANAND Rishab | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | NORTON Benjamin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | CIACCIA Luca | 100% | 81% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.