Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 2 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
| 3 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 3 | CHEN Oscar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 5 | OWENS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 6 | STONE Jack V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 7 | YANG Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 8 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 9 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 10 | WUN William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 11 | LIU David J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 14 | HUANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 15 | DIACOS Jordan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 16 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 17 | DESAI Drewv D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 18 | MENG Xiang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
| 19 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | MYERS Kaleb S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 11% |
| 22 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 5% |
| 22 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 24 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 25 | BRUSIE Christopher R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 27 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
| 28 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 18% |
| 29 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | PARK Collin D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 31 | GOODWIN Keith D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 33 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | < 1% |
| 34 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 36 | ATEFI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | CARLISLE Austin M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 38 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 39 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 40 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 40 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 42 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 43 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 44 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 45 | FRANKEL Yitzchok A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 45 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 48 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% |
| 49 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 49 | XU William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 52 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 53 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 54 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 55 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 56 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 97% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 57 | LIU kelly | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 59 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 60 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 61 | BONSELL Vance | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LICHT Aaron H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 63 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 64 | LUCZKOW Arman | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 65 | PINTO Gabriel R. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 66 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 67 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 68 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 69 | PREJEAN Patrick J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 70 | LEE Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 71 | CARTER Jackson | 100% | 100% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 72 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 73 | BERUBE Jesse L. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 74 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 75 | NARANJO David E. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 76 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 77 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 78 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 80 | SAMMI Mukund | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 83 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 84 | ALKIN Isaac | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 85 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 85 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 87 | COLLINS Andrew M. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | PLAGA Quinn | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 91 | GARCIA Ryan | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 93 | SMITH Vaughn | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 95 | ROPER Evan C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 96 | PLONKA Derek | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 97 | PEARSON James G. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 99 | LU Jiayi (Charlie) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 100 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 101 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 102 | TREFNEY Albert | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 102 | LU Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 104 | FOX Nicholas | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 104 | SHASHA zane | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | KARPINSKI Michael A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 107 | RYAN Will | 100% | 79% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 108 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 109 | BURNS Jackson P. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | WANG Andy | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 111 | BIRKS Evan D. | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 114 | ADHIKARI Anubhav | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 115 | TIMMINS Daniel R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 116 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 117 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | STEVENS Jeffrey | 100% | 80% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 119 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 119 | NIELANDER Elliot S. | 100% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 121 | HODGES Calvin | 100% | 84% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | HAYES Tyler | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 123 | COOK Aidan J. | 100% | 36% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.