Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 2 | MOSTOVOY Philip | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | SONG Aidan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 3 | KATS Brandon | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 5 | CHEN Tianjun | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 6 | ZHENG Jason | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 7 | WU Matthew | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
| 8 | WHITE Jackson | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 9 | FRIZZELL Kai | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 10 | TOPRANI Valmik | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 11 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 12 | CHO Adrian | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 13 | CHIANG William | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 14 | BHANDARE Veer | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 15 | SHAO Mason | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | QI Bryan | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | DAI Jason | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 18 | LEE Harrison | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 19 | BURDICK Elijah | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | YAKHNIS Seth | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | HONG Ethen | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 22 | DING Charlie | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 23 | SHAPIRO Samuel | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 24 | CHEN Jayden A | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHEN Regis | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 26 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 27 | RUDIGER George | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 28 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | GUJJA Rishabh | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | DAND Zahin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | LAI Jayden | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 32 | YU George | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | DIMOV Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 34 | THOMAS Andrew | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHENG Jasper | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 36 | NOOL Aaron | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 37 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | O'BRIEN Michael | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 39 | YOU Emmanuel | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LI Jayden | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | KIM Brendan | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | SON Isaac | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | ZHEN Maxwell | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | WAGNER Miles | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | LAI Jaxon | 26% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | KESELMAN Ron | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | HWANG Christopher | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | MINTON Tristan | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 50 | CHEN Benjamin | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 51 | ROFINO Samuel | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 53 | QUAN William | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Hayden | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 55 | YAO Irvine | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 56 | ZHANG Jacob | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | SHKOP Alexander | < 1% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | WHITE Leonardo | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.