Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 2 | MOSTOVOY Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 3 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 3 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 5 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 6 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 7 | WU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
| 8 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 9 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 10 | TOPRANI Valmik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
| 11 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
| 12 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 13 | CHIANG William | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 14 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 15 | SHAO Mason | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | QI Bryan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | DAI Jason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 18 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 19 | BURDICK Elijah | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 20 | YAKHNIS Seth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 21 | HONG Ethen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 22 | DING Charlie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 23 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 24 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 26 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 27 | RUDIGER George | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 28 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 29 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | DAND Zahin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 32 | YU George | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | DIMOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 34 | THOMAS Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHENG Jasper | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 37 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | O'BRIEN Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 39 | YOU Emmanuel | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | KIM Brendan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SON Isaac | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 43 | ZHEN Maxwell | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | WAGNER Miles | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | LAI Jaxon | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | KESELMAN Ron | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | HWANG Christopher | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | MINTON Tristan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 50 | CHEN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 51 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | QUAN William | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 55 | YAO Irvine | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 56 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | SHKOP Alexander | 100% | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | WHITE Leonardo | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.