Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Joonwon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 2 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 5% | |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | |
| 3 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 5 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | 2% |
| 6 | GUMPRICH Joe P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 7 | YANG Gary | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 8 | CAMPBELL Eva | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 9 | WALLACE George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 10 | DIMMETT David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 11 | EVANS George | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 12 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 15% | - | |
| 13 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 14 | HERMES Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 15 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 17 | FEAGIN Patrick | 100% | 98% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | DAVIS Jack | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | MILLSON Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 88% | 31% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | KARNAVAS William | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | LAPALLO Adam C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | HALES Adam | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | |
| 24 | AVILA Heru | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | COX Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 26 | FISH Bradley | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KRECK Marie | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 28 | SWENSON Jason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 29 | WATSON Taylor | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | HAVERSON Civa | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | EDELMAN Catherine | 100% | 85% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MADAR Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 2% |
| 34 | MILLNER Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 35 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | BARBER Christopher | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | WHEELAND Allison | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | COX Jeniffer | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LAI Angel | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.