MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | D D D V D | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
| 2 | XIAO Yichen | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 3 | PIENTA Chris J. | V V D D V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 3 | DHAL Leon | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 5 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 7 | FANG Hanning | V D V D V | V V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 8 | HU Anton | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 9 | WILLIAMS Logan | V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 10 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | DITTEL Aaron K. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | ASGARALLY Anthony | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | DEPAUW Devan | V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CAMP Ethan | V V D D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 16 | ZHANG Michael | D V D V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | KANAR Ian | V V V V V D | D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 18 | JUSCINSKI Michal | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 19 | BROOKS Zach B. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 20 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 21 | GINZBURG Adam | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | JOHNSON Jay | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | CONKLIN Jim | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 24 | ROWLAND Marsden | D V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 25 | HU Robert J. | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | UNG Kei | D V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 27 | CHEN Bowen | V D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 28 | BECKER Thomas | D V V D D V | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Derek | V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | HAUCK Samuel J. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 31 | SWANSON Dave | D D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 32 | LIU Quincy | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 34 | BOSS Evan | D D V V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 35 | LASIYCHUK Nikita | V D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 36 | SALLAM omar | D V V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 37 | ZHANG James | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | HUANG Kenneth | V D V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 39 | TOWNSEND George | D V D V D V | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 40 | ELTERMAN Lev | D V V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 41 | ECKEL Anson J. | D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 42 | ALI Adam | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 43 | HERDMAN Julian | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 44 | EVERT Todd | D V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 45 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | D D V V D D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 46 | WANG Kaiyan | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 47 | TU Jimmy | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 48 | ROBINSON Matthew | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 49 | VELDTMAN Gruschen | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 50 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 51 | SAYLOR Nathaniel | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 52 | APANASEWICZ Dan | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 53 | FANG Yunhan | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 54 | TIMEK Jan | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 55 | SEABLOOM Jack | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 56 | BENSCH Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 57 | GREEN Brian | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 58 | JANYSKA Allen | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 59 | LARSON Vaughn | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.