MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | < 1% | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 2 | XIAO Yichen | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | PIENTA Chris J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 3 | DHAL Leon | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 5 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 6 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 7 | FANG Hanning | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 8 | HU Anton | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | WILLIAMS Logan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 11 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 12 | DITTEL Aaron K. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
| 13 | ASGARALLY Anthony | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 14 | DEPAUW Devan | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 15 | CAMP Ethan | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | ZHANG Michael | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KANAR Ian | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 18 | JUSCINSKI Michal | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 19 | BROOKS Zach B. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 20 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 21 | GINZBURG Adam | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
| 22 | JOHNSON Jay | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 23 | CONKLIN Jim | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 24 | ROWLAND Marsden | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | HU Robert J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 26 | UNG Kei | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 27 | CHEN Bowen | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | BECKER Thomas | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Derek | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 30 | HAUCK Samuel J. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SWANSON Dave | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 32 | LIU Quincy | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | BOSS Evan | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 35 | LASIYCHUK Nikita | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | SALLAM omar | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 37 | ZHANG James | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | HUANG Kenneth | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | TOWNSEND George | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 40 | ELTERMAN Lev | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | ECKEL Anson J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 42 | ALI Adam | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | HERDMAN Julian | 23% | 51% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | EVERT Todd | 2% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 46 | WANG Kaiyan | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | TU Jimmy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ROBINSON Matthew | 5% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | VELDTMAN Gruschen | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | SAYLOR Nathaniel | 10% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | FANG Yunhan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | TIMEK Jan | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SEABLOOM Jack | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BENSCH Vincent | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | GREEN Brian | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | JANYSKA Allen | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | LARSON Vaughn | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.