MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SWOPE Farren | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 2 | OS Danielle | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 42% | 15% | |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 3 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | 3% | 39% | 58% | |
| 5 | SAMALA Reese | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 35% | 7% |
| 6 | HARRIS Parker | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 47% | 19% |
| 7 | HU Sophie | - | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 18% | |
| 8 | TAN Dorathy | - | - | 1% | 10% | 58% | 31% | |
| 9 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 10% |
| 10 | KNAPP Isabella | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | DONG Iris | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 12 | LIN Kenzie | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 13 | HUANG Natalie | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 14 | DESERANNO Seren | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 27% | |
| 14 | FRASER Morgan | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 16 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | SUN Nicole | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | KOZUB Joslyn | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZHANG Selina | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | YIN Emily | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 3% | 18% | 42% | 33% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LIN Athena | 12% | 39% | 38% | 11% | - | - | |
| 24 | REDEMANN Reagan | 16% | 43% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | MARTIN Sloan | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
| 26 | LEE Eun-Hae | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | HUANG Emma | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HEWITT Madison | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | ZHOU Jolena | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | WANG Esther | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | VANDEVEN Ingrid | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SKJEI Josephine | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 35 | MARTIN Avery | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | PETERSON Penelope | 32% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | LYNCH Kathryn | 20% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 38 | KU Amanda | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GENNARO Juliana | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.