MSA Fieldhouse - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SWOPE Farren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
| 2 | OS Danielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 15% | |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 3 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 58% | |
| 5 | SAMALA Reese | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% |
| 6 | HARRIS Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 19% |
| 7 | HU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 18% | |
| 8 | TAN Dorathy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 31% | |
| 9 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
| 10 | KNAPP Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
| 11 | DONG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 12 | LIN Kenzie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 13 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 14 | DESERANNO Seren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
| 14 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 16 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | SUN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 19 | KOZUB Joslyn | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZHANG Selina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | YIN Emily | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LIN Athena | 100% | 88% | 49% | 12% | - | - | |
| 24 | REDEMANN Reagan | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | MARTIN Sloan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 26 | LEE Eun-Hae | 100% | 91% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | HUANG Emma | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HEWITT Madison | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | ZHOU Jolena | 100% | 77% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | WANG Esther | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | VANDEVEN Ingrid | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SKJEI Josephine | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 35 | MARTIN Avery | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | PETERSON Penelope | 100% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | LYNCH Kathryn | 100% | 80% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
| 38 | KU Amanda | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GENNARO Juliana | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.