Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Dina C. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 3 | LI Christina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | ZHU Ella | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 5 | BYK Karalina | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% | |
| 6 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 7 | LEO Jenna | - | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | HOLLIS Priscillia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 9 | YEH Constance | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | - |
| 10 | SHI Micah | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Annalyn | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | XING Melly | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 30% |
| 14 | LIN Claire | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 15 | YANG Hanli | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 16 | LUO lucy | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 17 | BALIN Sophia | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 18 | KHETPAL Aalia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | WU Charlotte | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 20 | ZHANG Caroline | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 21 | CHAN Jolene | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 22 | YARBILOVA Aya | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | HUANG Gabrielle | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | HOU Xu | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 25 | BENNETT Emi | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | LU Miaotian | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | YOUM Amelia | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 28 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 29 | CHO Olivia | - | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 30 | MCCLAIN Madison | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | FAN Melody | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LIANG Jasmine | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | REILLY Carys | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | GENG Emma | 9% | 39% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | KIRBY Emelie | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | KIM Lael | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 38 | VO Evelyn | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 39 | ELNAGGAR lea | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MILLER Anna | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LE Minnie | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | LI Doreen | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | ZELDIN Nina | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | JU Victoria | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | LIU Bella | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | FOREST Ana Luisa | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | HEMPHILL Mia | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 48 | KIM Minjoo | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | DONG Audrey | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DONG Katelyn | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Gretchen | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | DUAN Hanling | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CLOUD Chrystie | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DOMINIK Eliana | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | DU Lindsay | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 57 | GOMEZ Amelia | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | SAVIR Abigail | 22% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MA Laurie | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LU Sophia | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.