Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Dina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | JOO Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 3 | LI Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 3 | ZHU Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 20% |
| 5 | BYK Karalina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | |
| 6 | ZHILKOV Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 7 | LEO Jenna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 2% |
| 9 | YEH Constance | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 10 | SHI Micah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Annalyn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 13 | XING Melly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 30% |
| 14 | LIN Claire | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 2% |
| 15 | YANG Hanli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 16 | LUO lucy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% | |
| 17 | BALIN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 18 | KHETPAL Aalia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | WU Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | ZHANG Caroline | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 21 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 22 | YARBILOVA Aya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 23 | HUANG Gabrielle | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | HOU Xu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 25 | BENNETT Emi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | LU Miaotian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | YOUM Amelia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 28 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 29 | CHO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 30 | MCCLAIN Madison | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | FAN Melody | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LIANG Jasmine | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | REILLY Carys | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 2% |
| 34 | GENG Emma | 100% | 91% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | KIRBY Emelie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | KIM Lael | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | VO Evelyn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 39 | ELNAGGAR lea | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MILLER Anna | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LE Minnie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 42 | LI Doreen | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | ZELDIN Nina | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | JU Victoria | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 44 | LIU Bella | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | FOREST Ana Luisa | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | HEMPHILL Mia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | KIM Minjoo | 100% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | DONG Audrey | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | DONG Katelyn | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Gretchen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | DUAN Hanling | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CLOUD Chrystie | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DOMINIK Eliana | 100% | 90% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | DU Lindsay | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 57 | GOMEZ Amelia | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 58 | SAVIR Abigail | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MA Laurie | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LU Sophia | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.