Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 2 | LI Sonia | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
| 3 | KWON Ava | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 5 | BAIK Sarah | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 6 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | MAK Kaitlin | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 8 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 9 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 10 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 13 | SHMULER Fiona | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 14 | LIU Chelsea | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 15 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | BARNES Sarah | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ZHAO Selena | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 18 | LAFFY Lily | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 20 | CHI Claire | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 21 | RANJAN Diya | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 22 | FUNG Iris | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
| 23 | JOHN Sophia | - | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 25 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KHOST Maeve | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 23% |
| 28 | NG Sophia | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | XU Elaine | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 30 | WONG Charlene | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG MONA | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KIM isabel | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KWON Ava | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 11% |
| 36 | MULLER Inara | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 37 | BORGUETA Madison | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 37 | PARK Haylie | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | STADNIK Emilia | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 40 | PASUPULETI Laya | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | BANDHU Saahiti | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 42 | VATS Ishita | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | KIM Audrey | - | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | RIFKIN Lielle | 3% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | - | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | MACKAY Katherine | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 48 | LEIGH Adalene | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 49 | FABRICANT Kioka R. | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | NIU Jessica | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 51 | HU Alicia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 52 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | HUANG Zoe | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | FIGELMAN Maya | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | MUKHERJEE Moupriya | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | FREEMAN Armine | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 57 | PROBASCO Leila | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 58 | LEE Grace | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 59 | HAGN Luna | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Janice | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | NANDA Maanika | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 62 | JONES Nima | 9% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 63 | SIROIS Neve | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | SHI Chuqing | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | KULIK Sophia | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | LEE Kaelyn | 7% | 42% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | VATSA Shradha | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | MCCLOSKEY Nora | 60% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | CALDERON Isabella | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.