Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 2 | LI Sonia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 3 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 5 | BAIK Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 6 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | MAK Kaitlin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 8 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 9 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 10 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | CASTELO Soleil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 12 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 13 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 13% |
| 14 | LIU Chelsea | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 15 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | BARNES Sarah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 17 | ZHAO Selena | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | LAFFY Lily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 20 | CHI Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 21 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 22 | FUNG Iris | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 23 | JOHN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 26 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 28 | NG Sophia | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | XU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 30 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG MONA | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KIM isabel | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KWON Ava | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 36 | MULLER Inara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 37 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 37 | PARK Haylie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 40 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | BANDHU Saahiti | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | VATS Ishita | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 44 | RIFKIN Lielle | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% |
| 48 | LEIGH Adalene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 49 | FABRICANT Kioka R. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 50 | NIU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 51 | HU Alicia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | HUANG Zoe | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | FIGELMAN Maya | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | MUKHERJEE Moupriya | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | FREEMAN Armine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 57 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 58 | LEE Grace | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 59 | HAGN Luna | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Janice | 100% | 76% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | NANDA Maanika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | JONES Nima | 100% | 91% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | SIROIS Neve | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | SHI Chuqing | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | KULIK Sophia | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | LEE Kaelyn | 100% | 93% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | VATSA Shradha | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | MCCLOSKEY Nora | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | CALDERON Isabella | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.