Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GUO Woody | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | KIM Remington | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | MULCAHY Sebastian | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | HERBRANDSON Luke | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | GREENMAN Duke | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | FEI Victor | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | DU Evan | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 8 | RONG Gordon | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 9 | FU Nolan | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | MA Ryan | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | KOU Mason | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 12 | MA Ciel | V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | WANG Dylan | V V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 14 | WU Nathan | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | LIU Xuyao | D V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | WOOLCOCK Cash | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | LEE Damien | V V V V D V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 18 | GADHVI Darius | V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | AVETISIAN Michael | D V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 20 | SUROV Alexander | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | V V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 22 | MOSLEY Wally | D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | KROTZ Nicolas | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | DENG Destin | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | XUE Michael | V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | KIM Evan | V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | WONG Alexander | D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 29 | LIN Daniel | D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | JAMES Kaden | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 31 | RONG Marcus | D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | SANDIRI Shanmukh Rishith | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 33 | FU Adrian | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 34 | CHOI SIWON | D V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 35 | TAVERNA Matteo | V D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 36 | LEE Davidson | V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 37 | MILLER Xavier | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 38 | HUA Nolan | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 39 | SHOURIE Neel | V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 40 | YOO Lucas | V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 41 | YU Brandon | V D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | PARK Sihoon | V D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 43 | WU Ethan | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | NICHOLAS Malakai | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 45 | YUN Nicholas | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | NOLAN Morgan | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 47 | DAVIDSON James | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | DEAN Isaac | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 49 | SHOURIE Seth | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 50 | CHAN Nathan | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 51 | HUR Tyson | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 52 | CROY Felix | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 53 | LAU Caleb | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 54 | LI Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 55 | HUNG Ludwig | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 56 | BRIDGEWATER Beckman | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 56 | GAREWAL Wesley | D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.