Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUO Woody | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 2 | KIM Remington | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 13% | |
| 3 | MULCAHY Sebastian | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
| 3 | HERBRANDSON Luke | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 5 | GREENMAN Duke | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 6 | FEI Victor | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 7 | DU Evan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 8 | RONG Gordon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
| 9 | FU Nolan | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
| 10 | MA Ryan | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 11 | KOU Mason | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 12 | MA Ciel | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 13 | WANG Dylan | 3% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 14 | WU Nathan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 15 | LIU Xuyao | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 16 | WOOLCOCK Cash | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | LEE Damien | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 18 | GADHVI Darius | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 19 | AVETISIAN Michael | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 20 | SUROV Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MOSLEY Wally | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 23 | KROTZ Nicolas | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | DENG Destin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 25 | XUE Michael | - | 4% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 3% | |
| 26 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KIM Evan | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 28 | WONG Alexander | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
| 29 | LIN Daniel | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | JAMES Kaden | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | RONG Marcus | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 32 | SANDIRI Shanmukh Rishith | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 33 | FU Adrian | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 34 | CHOI SIWON | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | TAVERNA Matteo | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LEE Davidson | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | MILLER Xavier | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | HUA Nolan | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | SHOURIE Neel | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 40 | YOO Lucas | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | YU Brandon | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | PARK Sihoon | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WU Ethan | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | NICHOLAS Malakai | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | YUN Nicholas | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 46 | NOLAN Morgan | 43% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | DAVIDSON James | 8% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | DEAN Isaac | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | SHOURIE Seth | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | CHAN Nathan | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | HUR Tyson | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CROY Felix | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LAU Caleb | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | LI Connor | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | HUNG Ludwig | 34% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | BRIDGEWATER Beckman | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | GAREWAL Wesley | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.