Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
2 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
3 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
5 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
6 | SOLARZ Arthur | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% | |
7 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | |
8 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
9 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
10 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
11 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
12 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
13 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
14 | BO Genero | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
15 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
16 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
17 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% |
18 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
19 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
20 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
21 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
22 | HE Bronto | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
23 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
24 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
25 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | |
26 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
27 | TANG Colin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
28 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
29 | WANG Eason | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
30 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
31 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
32 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
33 | LI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% |
34 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
35 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
36 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% | |
37 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
38 | AU Joshua | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
39 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
40 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
40 | AGUIRRE Pablo | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
42 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
43 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
44 | TANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | - |
45 | JHUNJHUNWALA Milan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
46 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
47 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 86% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
48 | DATSON David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
49 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
50 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
51 | LEE Elijah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
52 | YU David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 1% |
53 | OPERT Emmett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 7% | |
54 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
55 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
56 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
57 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
58 | CHAU Collin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 6% |
59 | HONG Ethen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
60 | MOZZER Nolan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
61 | NABI Mikhail | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
62 | PREVOST Landon | 100% | 79% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
63 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
64 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
65 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
66 | ALABI Azryl | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
67 | THOMAS Andrew | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
68 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
69 | TOPRANI Valmik | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
70 | HEMPHILL Kurt | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
71 | LIN John | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
72 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
73 | QI Bryan | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
74 | LAW Oliver | 100% | 78% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
75 | SHI Peyton | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
76 | DAI Jason | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
77 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
78 | WELCH Sebastian | 100% | 76% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
79 | KIM Louie | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
80 | DING Charlie | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
81 | JEPP Michael | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
82 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
83 | GARRETSON Luke | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
84 | LIU Jeremy | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
85 | JAISING Aaditya | 100% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - | |
86 | LI Tyrese | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
87 | MAZEL Antonin | 100% | 76% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
88 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 65% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
91 | SHI Evan | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
91 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
93 | LI Jayden | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
94 | LANE Sawyer | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.