Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JEONG Connor | V D D D V | V V V V V V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 2 | LIN Ryan | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | DAO Matthew M. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | MILAM Hugh | V D V V D | V V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 5 | CANDELA Nicholas | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | LEE Ryan | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | JUNG Alexander | D V D V D | V V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 8 | WELLS Tommy R. | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 9 | ZHU Wilson | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | TAMEZ Carlos A. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | MEINHOLD Li | D V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 12 | LEVY Zachari I. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 13 | SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. | V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 14 | JIN Nicholas | V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | ALAIMO Charles | D D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 16 | ZHU Max | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 17 | WANG Nathan | V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | ROBINSON Riley | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 19 | WEI Zikun | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 20 | MOORE Thomas J. | V V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 21 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 22 | PAEK Alex J. | V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | WONG Daniel | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 24 | ZHOU Alec Q. | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | MIELE Benjamin | D D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 26 | LEE Matthew C. | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 27 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 28 | SHARMA Sanil | D V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 29 | LIANG Aaron | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 30 | BALLINGER Thomas D. | V V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 31 | CHUNG Thomas | D D D D V V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 32 | USHER Alexander | D V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 33 | ROMERO Caleb E. | V D V D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 34 | MATTIS George | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 35 | KIM Sterling S. | D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 36 | MENDOZA Zachari | D V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 37 | MOSES Alexander | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 38 | MAENG Jake W. | D V D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 39 | KOSLU Aidan D. | V D V D D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 40 | POCSVEILER Magor | V V D D D D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 | |
| 41 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 41 | CHU Anthony | D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 43 | KAJI Ty | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | COMER Alexander J. | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 45 | WESTON Tom | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 46 | AHN Gus | D D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 47 | ARABACI Jack A. | D D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 48 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 48 | SOLTER Kai | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 50 | ESTRADA Luke | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 51 | BORLAND Isaac | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.