John J. Moore Athletics and Fitness Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | XIAN Kevin | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 2 | TIAN Andy | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | |
| 3 | CASCONE Raffaele | - | - | 5% | 36% | 53% | 7% |
| 3 | CAO Aaron | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 5 | HUANG Dalynn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
| 6 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 7 | TARDIFF Owen | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 8 | LIN Ziyue | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 9 | LEE Ryan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | WANG Leon | - | 1% | 15% | 53% | 29% | 2% |
| 11 | GENG Vincent | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | JIANG Ethan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | GUTKOVSKIY Ryan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 14 | SU Sean | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
| 15 | CHONG Cooper | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | LEVKOVICH Milan | 9% | 38% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 17 | MOSAMEH Faraj | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 18 | FANG Lionel | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | STABROWSKI Joaquin | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | LIN Tyler | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 21 | BANGALE Viraaj | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ZHANG Vincent | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Andrew | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | XIONG David | 29% | 47% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | XIONG Jeffrey | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | WU Kangdi | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | FAN Oscar | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | WOOD Theodore | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LI Tyler | 29% | 49% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.