Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Shawn J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
2 | DINU Nicholas D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
3 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
3 | SOHN Kevin J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
5 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
6 | BREIER Satchel E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
7 | KANG Brandon M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 4% | - |
8 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
9 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
10 | YANG Kevin S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
11 | WINKLER Lucas G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
12 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
13 | REESE Aaron S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
14 | BAILEY Asher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
15 | LIMB Matthew G. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
16 | KIM Benjamin H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
17 | LIMAYE Dhruv | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 11% | |
18 | FRIAS SAUL F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
19 | COPELAND Oliver E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
20 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
21 | KOUNALAKIS Evangelos T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% | |
22 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
23 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
24 | BALDAUF Frederick (Fritz) P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
25 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
26 | DAVIS Alexander N. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
27 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | LIU David J. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
31 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
32 | RUNDLETT Jakob C. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
33 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
34 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | REINSCH-GOLDSTEIN Alexander N. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | TRINH Trevor Z. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
37 | CHANG Nigel | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | GAO Ethan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
39 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | MOLINARI Luke M. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.