January NAC

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, January 5, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GUFFEY Christopher 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
2 KWALWASSER Eric 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 42%
3 KIM Ethan 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 23%
3 WANG ANDREW CHANG 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 4%
5 YAN William 100% 100% 97% 81% 48% 13%
6 HUANG Alex F. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
7 LEE Aidan 100% 100% 97% 79% 38% 5%
8 PATEL Rayn 100% 99% 91% 60% 20% 2%
9 ANTHONY Devyn V. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 34%
10 TAO Jeffrey 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
11 YE Eric 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 10%
12 KOVALEV Daniil N. 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 6%
13 SIDDIQUI Shayan 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 21% 4%
14 SOWERS Samuel 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 15% 2%
15 OH Aster 100% 100% 96% 80% 49% 17% 2%
16 TSE Aiden J 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
17 YANG Dylan 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
18 WANG Jerry 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 4% < 1%
19 SO Preston 100% 100% 98% 88% 63% 28% 6%
20 RAMANAN Jaisimh 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 7%
21 MUNGUIA Nathan 100% 100% 96% 72% 26%
22 GAY Jono 100% 97% 79% 44% 15% 2% -
22 LIN Maxim 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 41% 9%
24 ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) 100% 100% 98% 90% 66% 31% 7%
24 KATZ Ryan 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 3%
26 HU Chris 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 26%
27 LIN Philip T. 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
28 CHEN Samuel 100% 99% 94% 75% 44% 15% 2%
29 NGO Maximus 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
30 YANG Phillip 100% 96% 75% 38% 10% 1%
31 MALAITHONG Nathagorn 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
32 PINTO Marcus 100% 94% 63% 23% 4% -
33 KUSHKOV Daniel 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 48%
34 STURGEON Cole 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 5% < 1%
35 WANG Daniel 100% 99% 95% 76% 42% 11%
36 KANG Evan 100% 100% 95% 73% 34% 6%
37 SHIPITSIN Alexander 100% 100% 95% 76% 43% 14% 2%
38 LI Howard 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 39%
39 CHON Collin 100% 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 9%
40 SUBA Lucas 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 19% 3%
41 KIM ELIJAH 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 43% 11%
42 ZHAO Zhiyu(Yogi) 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 3%
43 JOO Jeein 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
44 SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 46% 13%
45 CONTRACTOR Cyrus 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
46 WANG Samuel 100% 100% 97% 86% 58% 25% 5%
47 GONZALEZ Jake 100% 100% 95% 73% 33% 5%
48 MATTOO Deven 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 4%
49 LINCOURT Arthur 100% 93% 68% 33% 9% 1%
50 KANG Evan R. 100% 100% 96% 75% 28%
51 ZHAO Lucas 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 21% 3%
52 BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
53 WANG Max 100% 99% 87% 54% 21% 4% -
54 CHUNG Connor 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
55 WANG Justin 100% 99% 88% 54% 18% 2%
56 SU Landon 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
57 CLARK Aram 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 8% 1%
58 ATWOOD Griffin 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 11% 1%
58 LIU Kevin 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 33% 7%
60 ANDRES Michael 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 11%
61 LIU Yijin 100% 51% 11% 1% - -
62 ZHOU William 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1%
63 GONG Alex 100% 94% 69% 34% 9% 1%
64 WONG Lucas 100% 95% 73% 39% 12% 2%
65 PRIEUR Christian F. 100% 94% 71% 37% 12% 2% -
66 CHAMBERS Miles 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 7% 1%
67 PRIMUS Nazir 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 45%
68 LEE Noah 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 28%
69 YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 21% 3%
70 GONG Gavin 100% 92% 62% 25% 6% 1% -
71 GREMILLION Obadiah 100% 95% 76% 42% 13% 2%
72 YOOK Isaac 100% 95% 75% 39% 11% 1%
73 KANG Matthew 100% 90% 60% 25% 6% 1%
74 HWANG Jayden 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 7%
75 KIM Kendrick 100% 99% 90% 61% 24% 4%
76 SUGIURA Samuel 100% 100% 95% 78% 45% 15% 2%
77 MEHAN Nicholas 100% 100% 97% 86% 58% 24% 4%
78 ZHENG LEON 100% 97% 71% 27% 4%
79 ZHAO Royce 100% 91% 52% 14% 1%
80 NG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
80 WANG Michael 100% 96% 77% 44% 15% 3% -
82 EYBELMAN Ariel 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 3%
83 DAI Zihou 100% 92% 65% 31% 8% 1% -
84 BADUSHOV Anton 100% 92% 64% 28% 7% 1% -
85 CHENHE YuHan 100% 96% 75% 39% 12% 2% -
86 SANGSTER Arden 100% 95% 72% 36% 9% 1%
87 LIN Felix 100% 93% 65% 28% 6% -
88 TSAO Oliver 100% 97% 80% 42% 11% 1%
89 LI Ayden 100% 90% 61% 25% 6% 1%
90 AUTREY Adrien 100% 81% 39% 10% 1% -
91 CAO Oliver 100% 96% 71% 30% 6% -
92 SHANKWILER Christopher 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 1%
93 WEI Rian 100% 97% 83% 52% 21% 4% -
94 LI Matthew 100% 90% 58% 23% 5% 1% -
95 KALPATHY Rohit 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 43% 10%
96 UEMOTO Ken 100% 99% 88% 59% 26% 6% 1%
97 CAO Donald 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
98 LEE William Nigel 100% 98% 87% 62% 30% 9% 1%
99 ZENG Vito 100% 96% 73% 35% 9% 1% -
100 NARDINI Nathanael P. 100% 98% 83% 52% 20% 4% -
101 KU Collin 100% 61% 20% 4% - - -
102 FANG Eason 100% 93% 68% 34% 10% 1% -
103 SUN Andrew 100% 99% 88% 60% 26% 6% 1%
104 GONG Jerry 100% 100% 97% 85% 57% 23% 4%
105 LIU Andrew 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
106 SADHU Neiyam 100% 88% 48% 14% 2% -
106 RAMANAN Govind 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 11%
108 SASSI Ilyas 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% -
109 LEE Andrew 100% 97% 83% 52% 20% 3%
110 BROWN Andrew 100% 49% 11% 1% - -
111 LI Yidong A. 100% 69% 27% 5% 1% -
112 LIM Brandon 100% 93% 61% 24% 5% 1% -
113 PEREIRA Beckham 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
114 LEE Brady 100% 95% 69% 31% 7% 1% -
115 VO Landon 100% 81% 43% 14% 2% - -
116 HUA Michael 100% 96% 75% 40% 12% 2% -
116 KAVZAN Toprak 100% 76% 35% 10% 1% - -
118 CHEN Jonathan 100% 99% 93% 73% 41% 13% 2%
119 HU Harry 100% 75% 35% 9% 1% - -
120 PAK Andrew 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
121 XU Ivan 100% 94% 71% 35% 10% 2% -
122 CAI Jeff 100% 95% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
123 WANG Max 100% 87% 55% 21% 5% 1% -
124 SEELMAN Cole 100% 43% 8% 1% -
125 SALMAN Hamzah 100% 92% 58% 21% 4% - -
126 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -
126 NGO Emerson 100% 67% 25% 5% 1% - -
128 CHAN Elliott 100% 69% 25% 4% - -
129 LIAO Yifong 100% 53% 14% 2% - - -
129 MATTOO Dhruv 100% 46% 10% 1% - - -
131 TSAO Alister 100% 74% 32% 7% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.