Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KROTZ Nicolas | D V V V D | V V V V V | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 2 | WONG Aaron | D V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | MOSLEY Wally | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | TANG Michael | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 5 | YU Brandon | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 6 | DING Max | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | SCHIPPER Johann | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 8 | SAMOYLOV Daniel | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | LIU Daniel | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 10 | CHAN Nathan | V V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
| 11 | YU Haoyun | D V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | BALUCAN Gabriel | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | LIN Daniel | D D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | YAO Tristan | V D V V D D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 15 | CHIN NAKAZONO Justin | V V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | NGUYEN Norris | V V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | YOO Lucas | V V V D D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | ABRAHAM Aaron | V D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | D V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | LUO Alvin Y. | D V V V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | XU Isaac | V D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | LO Stefan | V V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | LAU Caleb | V D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 24 | LIU Xuyao | V V D V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 25 | JUNG Brandon | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | KO Ian | V D D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 27 | JU Shang | D V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 28 | CHI Zachary | D D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | REN Mark | D D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | LEE Cooper | V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | NOLAN Morgan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | DODGE Myles | D D D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
| 33 | LI NATHAN | D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | YI Alexander | D D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 35 | CHO Lincoln | D D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 36 | LEE Connor | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | LEUNG Joon | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 38 | VINOD Davin | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 39 | SHARMA Mihir | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 40 | LIN Conner | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 41 | YE Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.