Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WELLER Teddy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
2 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
3 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
3 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
5 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
5 | BAILEY Asher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
7 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
8 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
9 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
10 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
11 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
12 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
13 | DESAI Drewv D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
14 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
15 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
16 | YOUNG Brendon | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
18 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
19 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
20 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
21 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
22 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
23 | BARLOW Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
24 | XU William | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
25 | FAN Wengronghao | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
26 | NGUYEN Andrew | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
28 | MADRID Derek | 100% | 88% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
29 | HENSHAW Joseph | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
30 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
31 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
32 | POSTMA Jacob | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
34 | KANDLIK Aaron K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
35 | STONE Christopher A. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | SUN David | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
37 | LU Evan | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
38 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
39 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | POSTMA Sean | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
40 | ACKER Alan | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.