Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DEMING Clare L. | V V V D D V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 2 | FOLEY Eileen | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 3 | ENOCHS Liz | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 5 | JOHNSON Laura S. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | WILSON Dawn J. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | VANCE Beth S. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | SMITH Chaz V. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | D V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 13 | SIERRA Kate | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | KIM Nam Heui | V D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 15 | GRAJALES Emily K. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | LAPP Laurie E. | V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | OBLONSKY Natalia | V V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | DUNN Linda J. J. | V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 18 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | V D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 20 | KING Robin E. | V V V D D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 21 | MARENTES Blanca E. | D V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | YANG Jenny J. | V D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | WILLEMSE Jamie | V V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 24 | GORDON Sharon | V D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | LORANG Kim L. | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | GLUCK Myriam | V D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 27 | GOMES Gisela | D D V V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | HANAMOTO Claire M. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | LUM Karen | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | HAYWARD Tammy | D D D D D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 32 | DEGEN Anita L. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | DENNER Jasmina | V V D D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 34 | WU Yik Chun | D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 36 | WALTER Joanne | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | MAUL Judy L. | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | DUDLEY Gayle | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 39 | WEBB Maud | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 40 | DAHL Naomi V. | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.