Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DEMING Clare L. | V V V D D V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 2 | FOLEY Eileen | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 3 | ENOCHS Liz | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 5 | JOHNSON Laura S. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | WILSON Dawn J. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | VANCE Beth S. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | SMITH Chaz V. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | V D V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | D V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 13 | SIERRA Kate | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | KIM Nam Heui | V D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 15 | GRAJALES Emily K. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | LAPP Laurie E. | V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | OBLONSKY Natalia | V V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | DUNN Linda J. J. | V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 18 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | V D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 20 | KING Robin E. | V V V D D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 21 | MARENTES Blanca E. | D V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | YANG Jenny J. | V D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | WILLEMSE Jamie | V V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 24 | GORDON Sharon | V D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | LORANG Kim L. | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | GLUCK Myriam | V D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 27 | GOMES Gisela | D D V V D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 28 | HANAMOTO Claire M. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | LUM Karen | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | HAYWARD Tammy | D D D D D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 32 | DEGEN Anita L. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | DENNER Jasmina | V V D D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 34 | WU Yik Chun | D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 36 | WALTER Joanne | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | MAUL Judy L. | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | DUDLEY Gayle | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 39 | WEBB Maud | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 40 | DAHL Naomi V. | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.