Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
2 | LEE Abin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
3 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
3 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
5 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
6 | YE Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
7 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% | |
8 | WANG sicheng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% | ||
9 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
10 | MAO Runxian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 3% |
11 | PARK Avan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 32% | ||
12 | LIU Zichen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
13 | JEON Joohun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
14 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
15 | PARK Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 2% |
16 | WONG Connor | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
17 | SUN Roy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 35% | |
18 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 42% | ||
19 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
20 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
20 | GUO Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
22 | WANG Waylon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 28% | ||
23 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
24 | TROYANKER Makar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
25 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
26 | WANG Eason | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
27 | CHEUNG Henry | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | TURBAT Travis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
29 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
30 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
31 | SHA Lambor(Laien) | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | KIM Liam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
33 | CHEN Solomon | 100% | 98% | 70% | 19% | 2% | ||
34 | TAN benjamin | 100% | 97% | 70% | 23% | 3% | ||
35 | MA Justin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
36 | CAO Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
37 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
38 | BHANGOO Arman | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
39 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | CABATO Luca | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
41 | CHONG Tanner | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
42 | LIN Sampson | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
43 | ZHU Ming | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
44 | YIN Luke | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | LITVACK Jackson | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
46 | WU Silin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | 3% |
47 | PARK Bryant | 100% | 94% | 45% | 7% | - | ||
47 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 94% | 53% | 12% | 1% | ||
49 | LEE Juneau | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | |
50 | FECK Noah | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
51 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
52 | NGUYEN Remy | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
53 | MENG Andy | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
54 | MENG Eric | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
55 | NGO Lincoln | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | FECK Shayne | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
57 | GU Evan | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
58 | CLIFFORD Max | 100% | 22% | 1% | - | - | ||
58 | KHANDAN MILAN | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | ||
60 | CHENG Alvin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
62 | CHOI Owen | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | THAO Zenji | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
64 | XU Jiachen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.