Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
2 | IM Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
3 | LI linze | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
3 | LEE Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
5 | WINTERSET Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
6 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
7 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
8 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
9 | CAO Donald | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
10 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
10 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 7% |
10 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 28% |
13 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
14 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
15 | VO Blake | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
16 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% |
17 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 26% |
18 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
19 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
20 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
21 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
22 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
23 | CHI Everett | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
24 | PADGETTE BRODY | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | LIN Ethan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
26 | TENG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
27 | GATTO Enzo P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
28 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
29 | CHEUNG Evan | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
30 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
31 | MOORE Greyson | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | YPHANTIDES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
33 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 17% |
34 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
35 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
36 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
37 | KIM Suin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
38 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
38 | LIU Clarence | 100% | 95% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
40 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
41 | SHEN Hudson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
42 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
43 | PONOTH Arnav | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
44 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
45 | LO Elroy | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
46 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
47 | OU Rigel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
48 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
49 | YANG Jake | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
50 | CHAN Troy Devon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
51 | FUGATE Logan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | COHEN Saul | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
53 | WU Allen | 100% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
55 | NAZIF Laith | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
56 | LEE Winston | 100% | 94% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
57 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
58 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
59 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
60 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
61 | LEE Alexander | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
62 | QI Zach | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
63 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
64 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
65 | KANG Leo | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
66 | GONZALEZ Paul | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
68 | YU Joshua | 100% | 63% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
69 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | - |
70 | KIM Leo | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
71 | WU Dustin | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | ZHANG Albert | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
73 | GRIFFIN Sid | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
74 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
75 | CHAO Stephen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
76 | KIM Derek | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.