Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SANCHEZ Jacob | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 2 | IM Tyler | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 3 | LI linze | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
| 3 | LEE Brian | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 5 | WINTERSET Mason | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 6 | LUC Cedric | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 7 | TANI Tino | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 8 | GU Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 9 | CAO Donald | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 10 | LI AYDEN | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 10 | CHEN Cooper | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 7% |
| 10 | LI Yidong A. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 28% |
| 13 | WANG Tiger | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
| 14 | KOVACHEV Martin | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
| 15 | VO Blake | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | LI Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
| 17 | RONG Jasper | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
| 18 | GUO Jonathan | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 19 | XIAO Brayden | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 20 | HAO Johnny | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
| 21 | LEE Nathan Uju | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
| 22 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
| 23 | CHI Everett | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 24 | PADGETTE BRODY | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LIN Ethan | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | TENG Lucas | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | GATTO Enzo P. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 1% | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | CHEUNG Evan | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | BRUM Charles E. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 31 | MOORE Greyson | 3% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | YPHANTIDES Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 33 | LIU Yijin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 17% |
| 34 | ZHANG KAIQI | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% |
| 35 | LIU Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | FU BRANDEN | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | KIM Suin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | CHEN Aaron | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 38 | LIU Clarence | 5% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | NGUYEN Ethan | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SHEN Hudson | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 42 | QI Jeremy | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | PONOTH Arnav | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | YUEN Caleb | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 45 | LO Elroy | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | WANG Ryan | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | OU Rigel | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 48 | DUFF Michael | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 49 | YANG Jake | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHAN Troy Devon | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 51 | FUGATE Logan | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | COHEN Saul | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | WU Allen | 30% | 48% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHOI LIAM | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 55 | NAZIF Laith | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | LEE Winston | 6% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | WANG David | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 58 | FISCHER Noel | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 59 | KIM Enoch | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Bill King | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 61 | LEE Alexander | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | QI Zach | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 63 | SLOAN Ethan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | HAN Kyle | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | KANG Leo | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | GONZALEZ Paul | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | FAN Yuchen | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | YU Joshua | 37% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 70 | KIM Leo | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | WU Dustin | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Albert | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 73 | GRIFFIN Sid | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | < 1% | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 75 | CHAO Stephen | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 76 | KIM Derek | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.