Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 2 | QI Zach | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 2% |
| 3 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 25% | |
| 5 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 6 | YE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 7 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 8 | DESAI Arthav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% | |
| 9 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | - |
| 10 | LEE Hubert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 32% | 2% | |
| 12 | YOON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | LI Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | FAN Yuen | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 14 | SUN alan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ZHENG Matt | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | YANG Collin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 44% | |
| 19 | LAD Anish | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 20 | CHEN Donovan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | ALLEVATO Luigi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 22 | CHOI Theo | 100% | 94% | 60% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | WOO Slade | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 24 | BURKHART Camden | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | VAN CLEVE Isaac | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | ZHU Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | 4% |
| 27 | YANG QuanHao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 28 | QIAO Jason | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | WEN Evan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | HE Kyle | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | JIAO Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 81% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | DAUM Billy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 33 | SHETTY Vikram | 100% | 99% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | CONCANNON Jackson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | WOO Sawyer | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | MCCANN Mercer | 100% | 82% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | FERNANDEZ leo | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | JUNG Diego | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | TAM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.