Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% |
| 2 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 3 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | |
| 3 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
| 5 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 6 | VO Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 7 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
| 8 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 9 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 10 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 11 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
| 12 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 13 | KIM Suin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 11% | |
| 14 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | |
| 15 | CHAN Troy Devon | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 18 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% | |
| 19 | DING Orlando | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEUNG Evan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LO Lei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 7% | |
| 23 | LIN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 24 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | LIU Clarence | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 27 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 29 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 30 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | LI Jason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | FAN Yuen | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | LAD Anish | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | ZHU yinxi | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ADAMS Jordan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 42 | WANG Darren | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LAM Ethan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | DENG Aurik | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | WU Allen | 100% | 83% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Leo | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | ZHANG Connery | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | DUBIN Jake | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | DESAI Arthav | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BODO John | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CHEN Donovan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | YANG QuanHao | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | KIM Derek | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | WU Kaiden | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 56 | QI Zach | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 57 | ZHAO Ivan | 100% | 99% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | SUN alan | 100% | 89% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.