Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GU Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 29% |
| 2 | HWANG Hagan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | OU Rigel | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% | |
| 3 | LUC Cedric | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 5 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 6 | VO Blake | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 7 | YUEN Caleb | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 8 | FISCHER Noel | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | LI Ryan | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
| 10 | WANG David | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 11 | FU BRANDEN | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 12 | QI Jeremy | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 13 | KIM Suin | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
| 14 | LVOVSKIY Roman | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
| 15 | CHAN Troy Devon | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | GUO Jonathan | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 18 | HAO Johnny | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% | |
| 19 | DING Orlando | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LEE Jayden | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEUNG Evan | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LO Lei | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 35% | 7% | |
| 23 | LIN Ethan | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | PARK Jayden | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | LIU Clarence | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHUNG Evan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | CHEN Aaron | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | CHOI LIAM | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | DUFF Michael | 1% | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 30 | HAN Kyle | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | LEE Bill King | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WONG Alexander | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 33 | LI Jason | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | FAN Yuchen | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | FAN Yuen | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | LAD Anish | 51% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LEI Isaac | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | ZHU yinxi | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ADAMS Jordan | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | TABANCAY Cole | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | WANG Darren | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LAM Ethan | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 44 | DENG Aurik | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | WU Allen | 17% | 44% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Leo | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | ZHANG Connery | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | DUBIN Jake | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | DESAI Arthav | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 50 | HSIEH Maxwell | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BODO John | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CHEN Donovan | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | YANG QuanHao | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | KIM Derek | 16% | 46% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | WU Kaiden | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 56 | QI Zach | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 57 | ZHAO Ivan | 1% | 26% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | SUN alan | 11% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.