Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Xilong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 2 | LIN Youlong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% |
| 3 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 3 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 6% |
| 5 | YI William W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 6 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% |
| 7 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 12% |
| 8 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | COSTE Fabien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 19% |
| 10 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% |
| 11 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 14% |
| 12 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 13 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% |
| 15 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 16% |
| 16 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 17 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 18 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 19 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 10% |
| 20 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 21 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 22 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 24 | PE Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 25 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 26 | FOY Grant | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 28 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | CHONG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | WEI Winston | 100% | 99% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 33 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% |
| 34 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% |
| 35 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 38 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 39 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KULKARNI Karan | 100% | 94% | 64% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | SMITH Jeremiah | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 48 | KARPMAN Benny | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | POUND Michael | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | PETRAITIS Matteus | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 51 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 92% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHEN Fengyi(James) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 54 | MCCARVILL Cooper | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | MARSHALL Kyler | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | YOUNG Luke | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | LO Ernest | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | TURNER Finian | 100% | 78% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | BURLINGAME Owen | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MALIGAYA Gabe | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | COLLIGAN Apollo | 100% | 82% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.