Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 2 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 3 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | |
| 3 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 5 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 6 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 7 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 31% |
| 8 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 10 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 10 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 12 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 17% | |
| 13 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 14 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 15 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 5% |
| 16 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 1% | |
| 18 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | PARK Sean | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | ZENG Oliver | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 3% |
| 25 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 26 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 28 | ZHANG Zhihan | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | LAU Caleb | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | MAQUILING Rorey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | |
| 31 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
| 33 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 34 | ONG David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 35 | MA kevin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 36 | LIU William | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | YI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 38 | SI Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 40 | YUN Mason | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | YANG Rony | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | LEE Connor | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | TENG Eric | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | LI Ethan | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 48 | YOON Ian | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | LI Connor | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | KONG William | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | HUNG Ludwig | 100% | 79% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | TAN Yichen | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | FEKETE Jack Fekete | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 55 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 56 | HAILU Noah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 57 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 59 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | THOMPSON Luca | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 61 | WON Jacob | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | MA Murphy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 63 | WANG Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 64 | GONG Rongtao | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | LU Jayden | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | LIU Zeyar | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | MCEWEN Max | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 69 | LEE Cooper | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | LAU Jesse | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | LEE Zeo | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | KOU Logan | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.